Y Dmitry Yarygin Tech
← Back to home

Mar 15, 2026

Why Most QA Courses Don’t Really Teach Test Engineering

A practical and personal look at teaching software testing, why one-size-fits-all QA courses often fail, and why mentorship works better when the student is actually ready.

Here I am.

I used to be a Software Test Engineer working in different tech companies, and at some point I realized a simple thing: I wanted to share my knowledge instead of only applying it in day-to-day work.

So I started teaching.

And after working with students, preparing lessons, explaining the same topics in different ways, and watching people either grow or get stuck, I started seeing a few patterns.

This article is not a motivational speech. It is just a short list of things I learned while teaching people who want to become test engineers.

A Test Engineer Is Way More Than Just Someone Who Tests Software

Everyone wants a different career path.

That is something we need to understand as teachers.

There is no single clean journey from point A to point B, even if many courses try to sell it that way.

Nope.

Even inside Software QA, people can move in many directions:

And that is just a basic list.

There are many crossroads between those fields too. A mobile tester may become an automation engineer. A QA engineer may move into security. A manual tester may become a product-focused quality specialist. Someone who starts with API testing may end up working closer to backend engineering.

That is why teaching testing as one single fixed path does not work well.

The student needs to understand the landscape, not only memorize a few testing terms.

Software Testing Courses Rarely Offer Enough Flexibility

The problem with many QA courses is that they are designed to produce a generic software tester.

Usually the program looks something like this:

That is not bad.

Those things are useful.

But the problem is that the course often stops there.

There is not enough focus on how software is actually built. There is not enough security. Not enough debugging. Not enough traffic analysis. Not enough understanding of real app architecture. Not enough reverse engineering. Not enough thinking.

Many courses teach people how to follow a testing checklist.

But a good test engineer should be able to ask uncomfortable questions:

What can break here?
What is the system actually doing?
What happens if the backend returns garbage?
What happens if the network is slow?
What happens if the app state is corrupted?
What happens if the user does something unexpected?

This is where the real value starts.

1:1 Mentorship Works Better

Everyone starts from a different place.

Someone is just learning how computers work. Giving that person too much technical information too early is counter-productive.

Someone else already has technical experience and gets bored if the course spends three weeks explaining what a browser is.

That is why individual mentorship often works better than a fixed course.

You can adapt.

You can slow down.

You can skip obvious things.

You can go deeper where the student is actually interested.

You can notice when the student is stuck not because the topic is hard, but because the explanation is wrong for that person.

That is hard to do in a large course.

It is much easier in 1:1 work.

A good mentor does not just throw information at the student. A good mentor helps the student build direction.

Everything You Need Is Already Available Online

Realistically, there is almost no secret testing knowledge anymore.

Most educational material is already available online.

You can find:

You do not always need to pay for content.

You should pay when the content is tailored to you, saves you time, gives you structure, or gives you feedback that you cannot get from public materials.

That is the difference.

Information is cheap.

Direction is expensive.

Feedback is expensive.

Accountability is expensive.

That is what a good teacher or mentor should provide.

Experience Matters More Than Certificates

Online courses love to sell certificates.

And yes, sometimes a certificate can help a little. It may look nice on LinkedIn. It may help someone pass an HR filter. It may show that you completed something.

But it is not the same as real skill.

What matters more is practice:

A certificate says that you finished a program.

Experience shows that you can actually do the work.

I do not hate certificates. I just do not think they should be treated as magic tickets into the industry.

They are proof of focus, not proof of mastery.

Teaching Is Worthless If the Student Is Not Ready

Here is the uncomfortable part.

Teaching works only when the student is ready.

If someone wants to become a test engineer only because they heard it is an easy way into IT, it may not work.

Testing is not just clicking buttons.

Automation is not just copying code.

Security testing is not just running a tool.

A person needs some curiosity. They need patience. They need to be willing to read errors, break things, try again, and ask better questions.

If the motivation is completely somewhere else, even a good teacher will not save the situation.

Spending money on a teacher is not a smart move if the person is not ready to put in effort.

A good mentor can guide, explain, motivate, and correct direction.

But the student still needs to walk.

A Good Teacher Should Not Pretend the Path Is Easy

I think this is another problem with many courses.

They sell the career path as something too simple.

Learn testing basics. Write a few test cases. Create a bug report. Get a job.

Sometimes it happens. But often it does not.

The market changes. Junior roles are competitive. Companies expect more. Even manual testers are often expected to understand API testing, logs, databases, basic automation, and development workflows.

So I think it is better to be honest. Testing is a good career path, but it is still engineering work. You need to understand systems, not just terminology.

That honesty may scare away some people, but it helps the right people move forward with a realistic mindset.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, no teacher, no course, and no certificate can replace personal readiness.

A teacher can make the process smoother, faster, and more focused. Real progress starts when a person decides to put in the work.

That is the part no course can do for you.